Bermed v. Singletary
This text of 608 So. 2d 836 (Bermed v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[837]*837Upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus we find that petitioner’s amended initial brief in appeal no. 88-2882 was received by this court August 1, 1990, and was before the panel prior to the decision of her appeal. The statement to the contrary in the order dated March 12, 1991 (appeal no. 88-2882) is an error. We grant the petition in part by striking from the March 12, 1991 order the phrase “and the appellant having failed to respond thereto”. As the brief was received by the panel in appeal no. 88-2882, the petition for belated appeal is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 So. 2d 836, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10461, 1992 WL 298151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bermed-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1992.