Bermea v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bermea v. State

779 S.W.2d 951, 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 2687, 1989 WL 128586

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 30, 1989·No. No. 07-89-0328-CR·Published

Opinion

POFF, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant Ronald Norton Bermea of burglary of a building with intent to commit theft and assessed punishment at five years confinement. Appellant appeared pro se at trial. Sentence was imposed on August 15, 1989. No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on October 10, 1989. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. Because appellant did not file his notice of appeal within the time limits of Tex.R. App.P. 41(b), this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.Crim.App.1988). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POFF, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant Ronald Norton Bermea of burglary of a building with intent to commit theft and assessed punishment at five years confinement. Appellant appeared pro se at trial. Sentence was imposed on August 15, 1989. No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on October 10, 1989. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. Because appellant did not file his notice of appeal within the time limits of Tex.R. App.P. 41(b), this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.Crim.App.1988). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED.

Bermea v. State, 779 S.W.2d 951, 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 2687, 1989 WL 128586 (Tex. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

779 S.W.2d 951 (Bermea v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related