Bermea-Cepeda v. Chaplain Chartier

487 F. App'x 78
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2012·No. No. 12-7108·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Juan Bermea-Cepeda appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bermea-Cepeda v. Chartier, 2012 WL 2366454 (D.S.C. June 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bermea-Cepeda v. Chaplain Chartier, 487 F. App'x 78 (4th Cir. 2012).

487 F. App'x 78 (Bermea-Cepeda v. Chaplain Chartier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related