Bermea-Cepeda v. Chaplain Chartier

487 F. App'x 78
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 6, 2012
DocketNo. 12-7108
StatusPublished

This text of 487 F. App'x 78 (Bermea-Cepeda v. Chaplain Chartier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bermea-Cepeda v. Chaplain Chartier, 487 F. App'x 78 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Juan Bermea-Cepeda appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bermea-Cepeda v. Chartier, 2012 WL 2366454 (D.S.C. June 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 F. App'x 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bermea-cepeda-v-chaplain-chartier-ca4-2012.