Berman v. Seeger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Berman v. Seeger

133 Misc. 849, 234 N.Y.S. 339, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 777

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 5, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The subtenants having failed to pay the rent for the non-payment of which the principal tenant was dispossessed, the lease of the subtenants falls with that of the principal lease.

Order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and final order dispossessing the said undertenants as prayed for in the petition of the landlords is granted.

I

All concur; present, Bijur, Lydon and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The subtenants having failed to pay the rent for the non-payment of which the principal tenant was dispossessed, the lease of the subtenants falls with that of the principal lease.

Order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and final order dispossessing the said undertenants as prayed for in the petition of the landlords is granted.

I

All concur; present, Bijur, Lydon and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Berman v. Seeger, 133 Misc. 849, 234 N.Y.S. 339, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

133 Misc. 849 (Berman v. Seeger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related