Berman v. Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berman v. Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc.

58 A.D.2d 821, 396 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12996

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.2d 821 (Berman v. Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berman v. Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc., 58 A.D.2d 821, 396 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to declare that certain restrictive covenants contained in agreements between [822]*822the plaintiff and defendant Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc., are void, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 24, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, (1) awarded the plaintiff $11,250, plus interest, and (2) declared that the restrictive covenant contained in paragraph 3(A) of the supplemental agreement was valid. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Niehoff at Trial Term. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to declare that certain restrictive covenants contained in agreements between [822]*822the plaintiff and defendant Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc., are void, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 24, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, (1) awarded the plaintiff $11,250, plus interest, and (2) declared that the restrictive covenant contained in paragraph 3(A) of the supplemental agreement was valid. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Niehoff at Trial Term. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 821, 396 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berman-v-reed-roberts-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1977.