Berman v. R. S. & Z. Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berman v. R. S. & Z. Realty Corp.

227 A.D. 730

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1929·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury. This rule is especially applicable in a case which involves the breach of a statutory duty on the part of defendant. (Kenney v. Rhinelander, 28 App. Div. 246; affd., 163 N. Y. 576; Bornstein v. Faden, 149 App. Div. 37; affd., 208 N. Y. 605; Heinberg v. Sikora Realty Corporation, 110 Misc. 323; Fitzwater v. Warren, 206 N. Y. 355; Kiely v. Yurgelevick, 226 App. Div. 753.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury. This rule is especially applicable in a case which involves the breach of a statutory duty on the part of defendant. (Kenney v. Rhinelander, 28 App. Div. 246; affd., 163 N. Y. 576; Bornstein v. Faden, 149 App. Div. 37; affd., 208 N. Y. 605; Heinberg v. Sikora Realty Corporation, 110 Misc. 323; Fitzwater v. Warren, 206 N. Y. 355; Kiely v. Yurgelevick, 226 App. Div. 753.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.

Berman v. R. S. & Z. Realty Corp., 227 A.D. 730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

227 A.D. 730 (Berman v. R. S. & Z. Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related