Berman v. Morris

200 N.E.2d 582, 14 N.Y.2d 849, 251 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1052
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 10, 1964
StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.E.2d 582 (Berman v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berman v. Morris, 200 N.E.2d 582, 14 N.Y.2d 849, 251 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1052 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi. Judges Feld and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse the order appealed from and to remit the matter to respondent for imposition of discipline not inconsistent with the following memorandum: In the light of appellant’s long service and of the particular circumstances presented by the record before us, it is our opinion that respondent’s dismissal of appellant from his position was excessive punishment, and that a suspension would have sufficed. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296, subd. 5-a, now CPLR 7803, subd. 3; see Matter of Payton v. New York City Tr. Auth., 8 N Y 2d 737).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 7803
New York CVP § 7803

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 N.E.2d 582, 14 N.Y.2d 849, 251 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berman-v-morris-ny-1964.