Berman v. Johnson

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMarch 22, 2022
Docket2:21-cv-01359
StatusUnknown

This text of Berman v. Johnson (Berman v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berman v. Johnson, (D. Nev. 2022).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 ROBERT BERMAN, Case No.: 2:21-cv-01359-APG-BNW

4 Petitioner, Order Granting Motion for Leave to File Documents under Seal 5 v. [ECF No. 33] 6 STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,

7 Respondents.

8 9 In this habeas corpus action, Respondents filed numerous exhibits on February 24, 2022 10 (ECF Nos. 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33). Respondents also filed a motion for leave to file certain of 11 those exhibits—Exhibits 48 and 52, both of which are presentence investigation reports—under 12 seal. Petitioner Robert Berman did not respond to that motion. 13 While there is a strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial filings and courts 14 prefer that the public retain access them, see Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 15 589, 597 (1978), a court may seal its records if a party demonstrates “compelling reasons” to do 16 so. See Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2006). 17 “Compelling reasons” exist where the records could be used for improper purposes. Kamakana, 18 447 F.3d at 1179 (citing Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598). Under Nevada law, presentence investigation 19 reports are confidential, and are not to be made part of a public record. See NRS 176.156(5). The 20 presentence investigation reports filed by Respondents contain sensitive confidential 21 information, which could be used for improper purposes. In view of the state law, and 22 considering the nature of the information in the presentence investigation reports, I find that 23 there is good cause for the exhibits in question to be filed under seal. ] I THEREFORE ORDER that Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Exhibits Under Seal (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED. Respondents are granted leave of court to file Exhibits 48 and 52 under seal. As those exhibits have already been filed under seal (ECF Nos. 34-1, 34-2), no further action is necessary in this regard. 5 Dated: March 22, 2022 US. District Judge Andrew P. Gordon 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 176.156
Nevada § 176.156

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Berman v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berman-v-johnson-nvd-2022.