Berman v. James
This text of 27 A.D.2d 720 (Berman v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment dismissing the petition unanimously reversed on the consent of the respondent, without costs or disbursements to either party, the petition is reinstated and the matter remanded for determination by Special Term. The original declaration by Special Term should not have been made in view of its dismissal of the petition for lack of standing of the petitioner to maintain the declaratory judgment action. Accordingly, this petition should not have been dismissed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Tilzer and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 720, 279 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berman-v-james-nyappdiv-1967.