Berman v. Goldstein
254 A.D. 629, 3 N.Y.S.2d 93, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6774
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The order is affirmed because the evidence discloses no property of the defendant subject to receivership. All concur. (The order denies a motion by the judgment creditor for the appointment of a receiver for the property of the judgment debtor.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berman v. Goldstein, 254 A.D. 629, 3 N.Y.S.2d 93, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
254 A.D. 629 (Berman v. Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gantz v. T.R.C. Holding Corp.
259 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Smith v. Smith
187 Misc. 669 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)