Berman v. Gables Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Berman v. Gables Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

108 So. 2d 53

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 1959·No. No. 58-294·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in the trial court assigns as error the entry of a summary final judgment for the defendant in an action brought to recover a deposit made pursuant to a contract to purchase an automobile. The contract was in writing and no genuine issue as to any material fact has been demonstrated by the appellant. It is urged that the trial judge erred in his construction of the contract, but a careful examination of the contract and the facts surrounding its execution does not convince us that error was committed. The construction of the contract was for the court. Pierce v. Isaac, 134 Fla. 666, 184 So. 509.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in the trial court assigns as error the entry of a summary final judgment for the defendant in an action brought to recover a deposit made pursuant to a contract to purchase an automobile. The contract was in writing and no genuine issue as to any material fact has been demonstrated by the appellant. It is urged that the trial judge erred in his construction of the contract, but a careful examination of the contract and the facts surrounding its execution does not convince us that error was committed. The construction of the contract was for the court. Pierce v. Isaac, 134 Fla. 666, 184 So. 509.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ„ concur.

Berman v. Gables Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., 108 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

108 So. 2d 53 (Berman v. Gables Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related