Berman v. Errico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berman v. Errico

125 A.D.2d 286, 508 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62547

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 1986·Published

Opinion

— In a medical malpractice action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated December 20, 1985, which denied his motion to permit him to conduct an additional physical examination of the plaintiff Roslyn Berman.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to permit him to conduct an additional physical examination of the plaintiff Roslyn Berman (see, Korolyk v Blagman, 89 AD2d 578). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a medical malpractice action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated December 20, 1985, which denied his motion to permit him to conduct an additional physical examination of the plaintiff Roslyn Berman.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to permit him to conduct an additional physical examination of the plaintiff Roslyn Berman (see, Korolyk v Blagman, 89 AD2d 578). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Berman v. Errico, 125 A.D.2d 286, 508 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

125 A.D.2d 286 (Berman v. Errico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related