Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided July 10, 2002·No. Appeal No. C-010609, Trial No. DR-9401054.·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY.
This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1).

The assignment of error is overruled because defendant-appellant William Berman's incarceration does not constitute the change in circumstances necessary to modify or terminate his child-support obligation. See Emmert v. Emmert (Feb. 18, 2000), 1st Dist. Nos. C-990119 and C-990126; Brockmeier v. Brockmeier (1993), 91 Ohio App.3d 689,633 N.E.2d 584.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.

Doan, P.J., Gorman and Winkler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002), (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).

Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002) (Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brockmeier v. Brockmeier
633 N.E.2d 584 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)