Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002)

DecidedJuly 10, 2002

DocketAppeal No. C-010609, Trial No. DR-9401054.

StatusUnpublished

This text of Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002) (Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berman v. Berman, Unpublished Decision (7-10-2002), (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY. This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1).

The assignment of error is overruled because defendant-appellant William Berman's incarceration does not constitute the change in circumstances necessary to modify or terminate his child-support obligation. See Emmert v. Emmert (Feb. 18, 2000), 1st Dist. Nos. C-990119 and C-990126; Brockmeier v. Brockmeier (1993), 91 Ohio App.3d 689,633 N.E.2d 584.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.

Doan, P.J., Gorman and Winkler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI