Berman v. Baraichi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berman v. Baraichi

113 A.D.3d 607, 977 N.Y.2d 912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.D.3d 607 (Berman v. Baraichi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berman v. Baraichi, 113 A.D.3d 607, 977 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

[608]*608In June 2012, the petitioner filed a family offense petition on behalf of his stepdaughter against the respondent, who is the stepdaughter’s biological father (hereinafter the father). The Family Court issued a temporary order of protection in favor of the petitioner’s stepdaughter. In July 2012, the petitioner filed a violation petition alleging that the father violated the temporary order of protection. In the order appealed from, the Family Court dismissed the violation petition, but not the underlying family offense petition. The petitioner has not raised any argument warranting reversal of the order appealed from. Accordingly, the order must be affirmed. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[608]*608In June 2012, the petitioner filed a family offense petition on behalf of his stepdaughter against the respondent, who is the stepdaughter’s biological father (hereinafter the father). The Family Court issued a temporary order of protection in favor of the petitioner’s stepdaughter. In July 2012, the petitioner filed a violation petition alleging that the father violated the temporary order of protection. In the order appealed from, the Family Court dismissed the violation petition, but not the underlying family offense petition. The petitioner has not raised any argument warranting reversal of the order appealed from. Accordingly, the order must be affirmed. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A.D.3d 607, 977 N.Y.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berman-v-baraichi-nyappdiv-2014.