Berman, Sauter, Record & Jardim, P.C. v. Robinson

132 A.3d 422, 224 N.J. 278, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 287
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 8, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court having granted appellants’ petition for certification; and having reviewed the briefs and heard argument of the parties; and the Court having determined that the trial judge was not precluded by Rule 1:12-1 or the Code of Judicial Conduct from presiding over this matter; and further the Superior Court, Appellate Division, having ruled on that issue sua sponte without notice to the parties and an opportunity to be heard (see Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of City of Elizabeth, 224 N.J. 126, 129 A.3d 1032 (2016)); and the Court having determined that this appeal can be disposed of summarily; it is therefore

ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed, and the matter is remanded to that court to [279] address the substantive arguments of the parties on the merits. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berman, Sauter, Record & Jardim, P.C. v. Robinson, 132 A.3d 422, 224 N.J. 278, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 287 (N.J. 2016).

132 A.3d 422 (Berman, Sauter, Record & Jardim, P.C. v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related