Berman Leasing Co. v. Miami Auto Radiator, Inc.

280 So. 2d 492, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7854
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1973·No. No. 72-656·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant plaintiff seeks review of the amount of a final judgment entered in its favor on a complaint for an open account, [493]*493account stated and for goods supplied and delivered contending the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the trial court’s grant of a set-off to the appellee-defend-ant.

We have carefully considered the briefs and arguments of counsel, and based upon the record as it appears before us1 we have concluded that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error on the part of the trial judge. Therefore, the final judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed in all respects.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berman Leasing Co. v. Miami Auto Radiator, Inc., 280 So. 2d 492, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7854 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

280 So. 2d 492 (Berman Leasing Co. v. Miami Auto Radiator, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rushing v. State
233 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)