Berlingieri v. Bruckman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berlingieri v. Bruckman

256 A.D. 994, 11 N.Y.S.2d 367

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 994 (Berlingieri v. Bruckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berlingieri v. Bruckman, 256 A.D. 994, 11 N.Y.S.2d 367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding to review the determination of the State Liquor Authority in revoking the petitioner’s liquor license on the ground that the licensee violated section 106, subdivision 6, of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, by suffering or permitting the licensed premises to become disorderly, in that females induced male patrons to purchase alcoholic beverages upon the premises on various dates. Determination unanimously confirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Matter of Menick v. Bruckman (279 N. Y. 795, decided January 18, 1939). In reaching this determination the matters struck out of the answer were not considered. Present —■ Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding to review the determination of the State Liquor Authority in revoking the petitioner’s liquor license on the ground that the licensee violated section 106, subdivision 6, of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, by suffering or permitting the licensed premises to become disorderly, in that females induced male patrons to purchase alcoholic beverages upon the premises on various dates. Determination unanimously confirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Matter of Menick v. Bruckman (279 N. Y. 795, decided January 18, 1939). In reaching this determination the matters struck out of the answer were not considered. Present —■ Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 994, 11 N.Y.S.2d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berlingieri-v-bruckman-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack