Berliner v. Wiener

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Berliner v. Wiener

95 N.Y.S. 1114

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1114 (Berliner v. Wiener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berliner v. Wiener, 95 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence of the two principals respecting the terms of the hiring, for damages upon the alleged breach of which this action is brought, is flatly contradictory; but the evidence of the employer is so measurably corroborated by other witnesses, by the application for employment signed by the plaintiff himself, and by circumstances that it seems proper to reverse the judgment as contrary to the weight of evidence. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The evidence of the two principals respecting the terms of the hiring, for damages upon the alleged breach of which this action is brought, is flatly contradictory; but the evidence of the employer is so measurably corroborated by other witnesses, by the application for employment signed by the plaintiff himself, and by circumstances that it seems proper to reverse the judgment as contrary to the weight of evidence. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berliner-v-wiener-nyappterm-1905.