Berliner. v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
This text of 87 N.Y.S. 455 (Berliner. v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant asks a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the weight of evidence. A reading of detached portions of the testimony may lead to that conclusion, but a careful reading of all the testimony discloses a conflict of evidence which was peculiarly for the jury to pass upon. The questions at issue were fairly presented to the jury in the charge of the court, and without exception, and I see no sufficient reason to reverse the judgment. .
The judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 N.Y.S. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berliner-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1904.