Berliner v. Berliner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berliner v. Berliner

294 A.D.2d 524, 742 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5561

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 524 (Berliner v. Berliner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berliner v. Berliner, 294 A.D.2d 524, 742 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered August 7, 2000, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), dated August 1, 2001, as directed a hearing to aid in the disposition of his motion, inter alia, to terminate his maintenance obligation to the defendant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

An order directing a judicial hearing to aid in the disposition of a motion does not decide the motion and does not affect a [525]*525substantial right. Therefore, it is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; Davidson-Sakuma v Sakuma, 280 AD2d 577; Palma v Palma, 101 AD2d 812). Any party aggrieved by an order entered subsequent to the hearing may take an appeal from that order (see Liebling v Yankwitt, 109 AD2d 780). Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered August 7, 2000, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), dated August 1, 2001, as directed a hearing to aid in the disposition of his motion, inter alia, to terminate his maintenance obligation to the defendant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

An order directing a judicial hearing to aid in the disposition of a motion does not decide the motion and does not affect a [525]*525substantial right. Therefore, it is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; Davidson-Sakuma v Sakuma, 280 AD2d 577; Palma v Palma, 101 AD2d 812). Any party aggrieved by an order entered subsequent to the hearing may take an appeal from that order (see Liebling v Yankwitt, 109 AD2d 780). Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 524, 742 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berliner-v-berliner-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack