Berliner v. Berliner

294 A.D.2d 524, 742 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5561
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 2002·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered August 7, 2000, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), dated August 1, 2001, as directed a hearing to aid in the disposition of his motion, inter alia, to terminate his maintenance obligation to the defendant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

An order directing a judicial hearing to aid in the disposition of a motion does not decide the motion and does not affect a [525] substantial right. Therefore, it is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; Davidson-Sakuma v Sakuma, 280 AD2d 577; Palma v Palma, 101 AD2d 812). Any party aggrieved by an order entered subsequent to the hearing may take an appeal from that order (see Liebling v Yankwitt, 109 AD2d 780). Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berliner v. Berliner, 294 A.D.2d 524, 742 N.Y.S.2d 864, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 524 (Berliner v. Berliner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henning v. Ritz
44 A.D.3d 1005 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Kornblum v. Kornblum
34 A.D.3d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Kalinka v. Saint Francis Hospital
34 A.D.3d 742 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Sloboda v. Sloboda
24 A.D.3d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re the Estate of James
5 A.D.3d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)