Berliner Handels-und Frankfurter Bank v. Coppola

New York Court of Appeals

Berliner Handels-und Frankfurter Bank v. Coppola

658 N.E.2d 211, 86 N.Y.2d 829, 634 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3638

DecidedSeptember 21, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 658 N.E.2d 211 (Berliner Handels-und Frankfurter Bank v. Coppola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berliner Handels-und Frankfurter Bank v. Coppola, 658 N.E.2d 211, 86 N.Y.2d 829, 634 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3638 (N.Y. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying appellants’ motion for reargument or renewal, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying appellants’ motion for reargument or renewal, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 N.E.2d 211, 86 N.Y.2d 829, 634 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berliner-handels-und-frankfurter-bank-v-coppola-ny-1995.