Berlin Taxpayers Ass'n v. Mayor of Berlin
This text of 173 A. 810 (Berlin Taxpayers Ass'n v. Mayor of Berlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition alleges that the city government acted fraudulently in voting to give up further prosecution of the action. The general principle is that while taxpayers of a municipality may bring suit or intervene and thereafter carry on or defend the proceeding when illegal action to their detriment is threatened or committed by the municipality (Brown v. Marsh, 21 N. H. 81; Merrill v. Plainfield, 45 N. H. 126; Brown v. Concord, 56 N. H. 375; Sherburne v. Portsmouth, 72 N. H. 539; Blood v. Company, 68 N. H. 340), yet the court may not permit their participation in a proceeding in respect to conduct of a municipality’s officers within their authority (Clough v. Verrette, 79 N. H. 356, 359). Here the vote was legal unless there was fraud. Fraud is alleged but the facts and matters claimed to constitute it are not set forth in the petition, as they should be. Lyme v. Allen, 51 N. H. 242, 244; Eastman v. Thayer, 60 N. H. 408, 413; Blood v. Company, supra. The petition should be dismissed unless after amendment specifying the essential details of the fraud, they are upon hearing found.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A. 810, 87 N.H. 80, 1934 N.H. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berlin-taxpayers-assn-v-mayor-of-berlin-nh-1934.