Berlin Mills Co. v. Poole

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Berlin Mills Co. v. Poole

62 N.H. 439

DecidedDecember 5, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.H. 439 (Berlin Mills Co. v. Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berlin Mills Co. v. Poole, 62 N.H. 439 (N.H. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The trustees must be charged. G. L., c. 249, s. 48; Thompson v. Smith, 57 N. H. 306. The order is for wages to be earned in the future, and by the express language of the statute an acceptance in writing is made essential to its validity. Whether, in analogy to the doctrine respecting the registry of deeds, notice to the creditor of an order conforming to the requirements of the statute would be equivalent to filing a copy with the town-clerk need not now be determined.

Trustees charged.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter, J.

The trustees must be charged. G. L., c. 249, s. 48; Thompson v. Smith, 57 N. H. 306. The order is for wages to be earned in the future, and by the express language of the statute an acceptance in writing is made essential to its validity. Whether, in analogy to the doctrine respecting the registry of deeds, notice to the creditor of an order conforming to the requirements of the statute would be equivalent to filing a copy with the town-clerk need not now be determined.

Trustees charged.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 N.H. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berlin-mills-co-v-poole-nh-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack