Berlin Acey Odom v. Dr. George Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Huntsville, Texas

359 F.2d 66, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6437
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 1966
Docket22709
StatusPublished

This text of 359 F.2d 66 (Berlin Acey Odom v. Dr. George Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Huntsville, Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berlin Acey Odom v. Dr. George Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Huntsville, Texas, 359 F.2d 66, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6437 (5th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by a State prisoner from denial by the District Court of his petition for habeas corpus. Following a full hearing, the District Court made full and complete findings of fact and concluded that appellant had failed to establish any basis for a collateral attack on his judgment of conviction and sentence by the State court. These findings cannot be said to be clearly erroneous, in light of the support for them found both at the District Court trial and in the State record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 F.2d 66, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berlin-acey-odom-v-dr-george-beto-director-texas-department-of-ca5-1966.