Berler v. Edelsohn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berler v. Edelsohn

216 A.D. 847

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D. 847 (Berler v. Edelsohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berler v. Edelsohn, 216 A.D. 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, to dismiss the counterclaim, and for severance of the issues, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The motion to dismiss the counterclaim should have been made within ten days after service of the answer. (Rule 110, Rules of Civil Practice.) The issues presented by the pleadings as amplified by the affidavits show that the ease should be tried, and not disposed of summarily. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, to dismiss the counterclaim, and for severance of the issues, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The motion to dismiss the counterclaim should have been made within ten days after service of the answer. (Rule 110, Rules of Civil Practice.) The issues presented by the pleadings as amplified by the affidavits show that the ease should be tried, and not disposed of summarily. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D. 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berler-v-edelsohn-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack