Berler v. Edelsohn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berler v. Edelsohn

216 A.D. 847

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, to dismiss the counterclaim, and for severance of the issues, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The motion to dismiss the counterclaim should have been made within ten days after service of the answer. (Rule 110, Rules of Civil Practice.) The issues presented by the pleadings as amplified by the affidavits show that the ease should be tried, and not disposed of summarily. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, to dismiss the counterclaim, and for severance of the issues, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The motion to dismiss the counterclaim should have been made within ten days after service of the answer. (Rule 110, Rules of Civil Practice.) The issues presented by the pleadings as amplified by the affidavits show that the ease should be tried, and not disposed of summarily. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Berler v. Edelsohn, 216 A.D. 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

216 A.D. 847 (Berler v. Edelsohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related