Berland v. Berland

47 A.D.2d 540, 363 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8605
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 47 A.D.2d 540 (Berland v. Berland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berland v. Berland, 47 A.D.2d 540, 363 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to section 466 (subd. [c]) of the Family Court Act to modify, with respect to support, a Mexican divorce decree, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 13, 1973, which, inter alla, fixed the amount of support and arrears to be paid by respondent. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding thereto a provision directing respondent to reimburse petitioner in the amount of $1,050 for her payment toward their son’s college tuition, with interest thereon from the dates of her payments. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Respondent agreed to pay college expenses and complete support for the son while he was in college. Thus, although petitioner was not entitled to support for the son while he was in college, she was entitled to reimbursement for amounts expended by her for the son’s college tuition, the obligation for which had been voluntarily assumed by respondent. The request for reimbursement for medical expenses was advanced for the first time in this court, although respondent had attempted to argue in the Family Court that in fact petitioner owed him money for medical expenditures. If petitioner believes she is entitled to be reimbursed by respondent for medical fees, her remedy, if she be so advised, lies in an application to the Family Court. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hirsch v. Hirsch
142 A.D.2d 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Roome v. Roome
87 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Connolly v. Connolly
83 A.D.2d 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Francis v. Francis
61 A.D.2d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Tannenbaum v. Tannenbaum
50 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.2d 540, 363 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berland-v-berland-nyappdiv-1975.