Berkshire Coal & Grain Co. v. Saunders

235 A.D. 878

This text of 235 A.D. 878 (Berkshire Coal & Grain Co. v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berkshire Coal & Grain Co. v. Saunders, 235 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Rhodes, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and reinstatement of the verdict on the ground that the plaintiff failed to move for direction of verdict and, therefore, admitted there was question of fact for the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkshire-coal-grain-co-v-saunders-nyappdiv-1932.