Berkowitz v. Rothschild
279 A.D. 909, 110 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5281
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendant. Defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars and examination in accordance with the items set forth in his demand and notice. The order, however, correctly conforms to the sequence provided for in the orders of August 8, 1951. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berkowitz v. Rothschild, 279 A.D. 909, 110 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5281 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 909 (Berkowitz v. Rothschild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cornell v. Mor-Nell Development Corp.
43 Misc. 2d 1086 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)