Berkowitz v. Klingmann

84 F.2d 991, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4689
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 1936
DocketNo. 6960
StatusPublished

This text of 84 F.2d 991 (Berkowitz v. Klingmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berkowitz v. Klingmann, 84 F.2d 991, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4689 (6th Cir. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the record that this action was not commenced (section 14067 of the Compiled Laws of Michigan 1929; Whalen v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 239 Mich. 482, 214 N.W. 410) within the time allowed therefor by the statute of limitations (section 13976 of the Compiled Laws of Michigan 1929) for the bringing of such actions, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whalen v. Wayne Circuit Judge
214 N.W. 410 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F.2d 991, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkowitz-v-klingmann-ca6-1936.