Berkowitz v. Holland & Knight
498 So. 2d 1066, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11085
This text of 498 So. 2d 1066 (Berkowitz v. Holland & Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Berkowitz v. Holland & Knight, 498 So. 2d 1066, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11085 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
Reversed. We believe the appellant’s amended complaint stated a cause of action for tortious interference with an existing contractual relationship against all of the appellees. See Wackenhut Corporation v. Maimone, 389 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 383 (Fla.1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wackenhut Corp. v. Maimone
389 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
498 So. 2d 1066, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkowitz-v-holland-knight-fladistctapp-1986.