Berkowitz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

168 Misc. 357, 6 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1805
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 30, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The verdict was directed on the theory that the proofs of claim were defective because one of the answers of the physician showed that plaintiff’s condition was not growing worse. If this point was to be made it should have been called to plaintiff’s attention at the time so that, if erroneous, it might have been corrected. (Rudolph v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 251 N. Y. 208.) The point could not properly be raised for the first time on the trial as a conclusive objection to plaintiff’s recovery. (See Wachtel v. Equitable Life Ins. Soc., 266 N. Y. 345.) The minutes of the previous trial were improperly admitted in evidence.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Frankenthaler, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berkowitz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, 168 Misc. 357, 6 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

168 Misc. 357 (Berkowitz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wachtel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
194 N.E. 850 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Rudolph v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
167 N.E. 223 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)