Berkowitz v. Berkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berkowitz v. Berkowitz

42 A.D.2d 599, 346 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4064

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 599 (Berkowitz v. Berkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berkowitz v. Berkowitz, 42 A.D.2d 599, 346 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions for divorce and separation, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated January 15, 1973, as denied his motion to vacate the wife’s notice to [600]*600examine him before trial and in part granted her cross motion to examine him, i.e., only as to “ his financial circumstances.” Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs; motion to vacate the notice of examination granted and cross motion denied in its entirety. There was no sufficient showing of special circumstances warranting an examination before trial {Stern v. Stern, 39 A D 2d 767). Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Grulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions for divorce and separation, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated January 15, 1973, as denied his motion to vacate the wife’s notice to [600]*600examine him before trial and in part granted her cross motion to examine him, i.e., only as to “ his financial circumstances.” Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs; motion to vacate the notice of examination granted and cross motion denied in its entirety. There was no sufficient showing of special circumstances warranting an examination before trial {Stern v. Stern, 39 A D 2d 767). Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Grulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 599, 346 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkowitz-v-berkowitz-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack