Berkowitz v. Berkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berkowitz v. Berkowitz

233 A.D. 875

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 875 (Berkowitz v. Berkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berkowitz v. Berkowitz, 233 A.D. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified so as to provide that appellant be allowed twenty dollars a week for her support from March 17, 1931, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with costs to appellant; the arrears that shall have accrued at that rate between March seventeenth and the date of the order entered herein to be paid by respondent at the rate of an additional five dollars a week until such arrears shall have been paid. In our opinion it follows, from the decree of separation in the wife’s favor, that she is entitled to reasonable alimony. Conclusion of law numbered third is reversed and the following conclusion substituted: “ Third. That the defendant herein shall receive alimony at the rate of $20 a week.” Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified so as to provide that appellant be allowed twenty dollars a week for her support from March 17, 1931, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with costs to appellant; the arrears that shall have accrued at that rate between March seventeenth and the date of the order entered herein to be paid by respondent at the rate of an additional five dollars a week until such arrears shall have been paid. In our opinion it follows, from the decree of separation in the wife’s favor, that she is entitled to reasonable alimony. Conclusion of law numbered third is reversed and the following conclusion substituted: “ Third. That the defendant herein shall receive alimony at the rate of $20 a week.” Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkowitz-v-berkowitz-nyappdiv-1931.