Berkovitz v. Wooten
This text of 9 A.D.2d 902 (Berkovitz v. Wooten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover a balance alleged to be due under a written agreement, the appeal is (1) from an order entered November 12, 1958 granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment striking out the answer, (2) from the judgment entered thereon, and (3) from so much of an order entered December 22, 1958 as on rehearing adhered to the original determination. Order entered December 22, 1958, insofar as appealed from, and judgment unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order entered November 12, 1958 dismissed, without costs. (Mascia v. Torinese, 9 A D 2d 772.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock and Kleinfeld, JJ.; Murphy, J., deceased.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.D.2d 902, 195 N.Y.S.2d 601, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkovitz-v-wooten-nyappdiv-1959.