Berkliff Undergarment Corp. v. Weissman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berkliff Undergarment Corp. v. Weissman

277 A.D.2d 964

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 3, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 964 (Berkliff Undergarment Corp. v. Weissman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berkliff Undergarment Corp. v. Weissman, 277 A.D.2d 964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Order vacating notice to take the testimony before trial of a witness and the subpoena served upon him unanimously reversed, with $10 costs, and the examination directed to proceed at a time to be fixed. The mere fact that the witness is an attorney does not, in and of itself, bar his examination. He may, upon his examination, raise the question of privilege if it appears that he is being asked to disclose confidential communications between attorney and client. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order vacating notice to take the testimony before trial of a witness and the subpoena served upon him unanimously reversed, with $10 costs, and the examination directed to proceed at a time to be fixed. The mere fact that the witness is an attorney does not, in and of itself, bar his examination. He may, upon his examination, raise the question of privilege if it appears that he is being asked to disclose confidential communications between attorney and client. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkliff-undergarment-corp-v-weissman-nyappdiv-1950.