Berkley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Berkley v. State

1911 OK CR 472, 118 P. 1104, 6 Okla. Crim. 663

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 9, 1911

DocketNo. A-830, No. A-831, No. A-832.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 472 (Berkley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berkley v. State, 1911 OK CR 472, 118 P. 1104, 6 Okla. Crim. 663 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, W. C. Berkley, was convicted in the superior court of Logan county of a violation of the prohibition law, and was on March 17, 1910, sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and to pay a fine of one hundred and fifty dollars. The plaintiff in error, C. R. Schafer, was convicted in the superior court of Logan county of a violation of the prohibition law and was, on March 17, 1910, sentenced to serve a term of sixty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars. The plaintiffs in error, D. 'Mater and Frank Burgess, were jointly convicted in the superior court of Logan county of a violation of the prohibition law. On March 17, 1910, the said Mater was sentenced to serve a term of sixty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of one hundred and fifty dollars, and the said Burgess was sentenced to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. In each of the foregoing causes the trial was had before a jury composed of six men over the objection of the defendants. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the court in-the ease of Dalton v. The State, infra, 116 Pac. 954, the aforesaid judgments are reversed and the causes remanded to the superior court of Logan county with directions to grant new trials therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, W. C. Berkley, was convicted in the superior court of Logan county of a violation of the prohibition law, and was on March 17, 1910, sentenced to serve a term of ninety days in the county jail and to pay a fine of one hundred and fifty dollars. The plaintiff in error, C. R. Schafer, was convicted in the superior court of Logan county of a violation of the prohibition law and was, on March 17, 1910, sentenced to serve a term of sixty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars. The plaintiffs in error, D. 'Mater and Frank Burgess, were jointly convicted in the superior court of Logan county of a violation of the prohibition law. On March 17, 1910, the said Mater was sentenced to serve a term of sixty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of one hundred and fifty dollars, and the said Burgess was sentenced to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. In each of the foregoing causes the trial was had before a jury composed of six men over the objection of the defendants. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the court in-the ease of Dalton v. The State, infra, 116 Pac. 954, the aforesaid judgments are reversed and the causes remanded to the superior court of Logan county with directions to grant new trials therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 472, 118 P. 1104, 6 Okla. Crim. 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkley-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack