Berkley v. Korcad Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berkley v. Korcad Corp.

8 A.D.2d 785, 187 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8202

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 785 (Berkley v. Korcad Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berkley v. Korcad Corp., 8 A.D.2d 785, 187 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten appellant’s and respondent’s points, on condition that appellant serves one copy of the typewritten appellant’s points or briefs submitted below upon the attorney for the respondent and files six typewritten copies thereof, together with the original record, on or before noon on June 12, 1959, with notice of argument for June 19, 1959. The respondent is to serve one copy of his respondent’s points or briefs submitted below on the attorney for the appellant and file six copies thereof on or before noon on Jume 17, 1959. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten appellant’s and respondent’s points, on condition that appellant serves one copy of the typewritten appellant’s points or briefs submitted below upon the attorney for the respondent and files six typewritten copies thereof, together with the original record, on or before noon on June 12, 1959, with notice of argument for June 19, 1959. The respondent is to serve one copy of his respondent’s points or briefs submitted below on the attorney for the appellant and file six copies thereof on or before noon on Jume 17, 1959. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 785, 187 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkley-v-korcad-corp-nyappdiv-1959.