Berkeypile v. Westfield Insurance

767 N.W.2d 657, 483 Mich. 1133
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 17, 2009
Docket137353
StatusPublished

This text of 767 N.W.2d 657 (Berkeypile v. Westfield Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berkeypile v. Westfield Insurance, 767 N.W.2d 657, 483 Mich. 1133 (Mich. 2009).

Opinion

Orders Granting Oral Arguments in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal July 17, 2009:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order and shall address the effect of paragraph E(l)(a) of the Westfield policy’s Michigan uninsured motorist coverage, which provides that “[i]f there is other applicable insurance available under one or more policies or provisions of coverage ... [t]he maximum recovery under all coverage forms or policies *1134 combined may equal but not exceed the highest applicable limit for any one vehicle under any coverage form or policy providing coverage on either a primary or excess basis.” The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 N.W.2d 657, 483 Mich. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkeypile-v-westfield-insurance-mich-2009.