Berkeley v. Epstein

260 A.D. 877, 22 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5192

This text of 260 A.D. 877 (Berkeley v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berkeley v. Epstein, 260 A.D. 877, 22 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Action for damages for the issuance of wrongful process and entry upon property pursuant thereto. Order dated May 27, 1940, granting reargument and on reargument denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113, Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. A question of fact exists as to whether or not the defendant procured the entry of the order which is claimed to have resulted in damage to the plaintiff. Appeal from original order dated April 25, 1940, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 877, 22 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkeley-v-epstein-nyappdiv-1940.