Berkeley Community Health Project v. City of Berkeley

966 F. Supp. 941, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11975, 1997 WL 359258
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedJune 17, 1997
DocketNo. C95 00665 CW
StatusPublished

This text of 966 F. Supp. 941 (Berkeley Community Health Project v. City of Berkeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berkeley Community Health Project v. City of Berkeley, 966 F. Supp. 941, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11975, 1997 WL 359258 (N.D. Cal. 1997).

Opinion

ORDER VACATING INJUNCTION, DISMISSING ACTION AND PROVIDING FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

WILKEN, Judge.

The Court having read and considered the stipulated settlement of the parties herein: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1.The preliminary injunction heretofore issued by this Court enjoining the enforcement of Berkeley Municipal Code chapter 13.37 is hereby vacated and dissolved.

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice.

3. Defendants shall pay plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees in the amount of $110,000 as set forth in the stipulation of the parties.

STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT, VACATION OF INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL OF ACTION

It is hereby stipulated by and between the plaintiffs and defendants in the above-entitled matter as follows:

1. The Berkeley City Council intends to adopt the following two ordinances:

a. A repeal of Berkeley Municipal Code (“B.M.C.”) sections 13.36.015 and related provisions of B.M.C. section 13.36.100,- which regulate sitting and lying on sidewalks in commercial districts; and

b. An amendment to B.M.C. chapter 13.37 to delete the provisions thereof relating to solicitation after dark, from persons entering or exiting automobiles and within six feet of building fronts adjacent to the public right of way.

2. Upon adoption of such ordinances, the parties stipulate that an order may be entered in this matter as follows:

a. As the parties have entered into a stipulated settlement, the injunction entered herein against the enforcement of B.M.C. chapter 13.37 shall be vacated and the parties request that the Court submit this order for publication;

b. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice.

3. Defendant City of Berkeley shall pay one of plaintiffs’ counsel of record, the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California (ACLU), the sum of one hundred and ten thousand dollars ($110,-000.00) in total satisfaction of any claims plaintiffs or their attorneys may have by way of damages, attorneys’ fees or costs in this action.

4. Plaintiffs and their attorneys and each of them, release defendants and each of them, and any of the City’s current or former [942]*942officials, affiliates, agents, employees, attorneys, successors, predecessors or assigns, from any complaint, claim, charge, claim for relief, demand, action, suit, action or cause of action existing at any time up to the date of this Agreement, whether in law or equity, which they could assert at common law or under statute, constitutions, regulation, order or law whether federal, state or local, or under any contract, or based upon any grounds whatsoever, with respect to any event, matter, claim, occurrence, damage or injury arising out of or associated with the enactment or modification of the laws challenged in this action, whether known or unknown.

5. Defendants and their attorneys and each of them, release plaintiffs and their attorneys and each of them, their current or former officials, affiliates, agents, employees, attorneys, successors, predecessors or assigns, from any complaint, claim, charge, claim for relief, demand, action, suit, action or cause of action existing at any time up to the date of this Agreement, whether in law or equity, which they could assert at common law or under statute, constitutions, regulation, order or law whether federal, state or local,' or under any contract, or based upon any grounds whatsoever with respect to any event, matter, claim, occurrence, damage or injury arising out of or associated with the enactment or modification of the laws challenged in this action, whether known or unknown.

ORDINANCE NO. 6372-N.S.

REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 6267-N.S., PROHIBITING SITTING AND LYING ON SIDEWALKS IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS

BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Berkeley as follows:

Section 1: That Ordinance No. 6267-N.S. is hereby repealed.

Section 2: Copies of this Bill shall be posted for two days prior to adoption in front of the Civic Center Building. Within fifteen days of adoption, copies of this Ordinance shall be filed at each branch of the Berkeley Public Library and the title shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation.

At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Berkeley, held on April 29, 1997, this Bill was passed to print and ordered published by posting by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers Breland, Maio, Shi-rek, Spring, and Worthington.

Noes: Councilmembers Armstrong, Olds, Woolley and President Dean.

Absent: None.

At a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Berkeley, held on May 13, 1997, this Ordinance was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers Breland, Maio, Shi-rek, Spring, and Worthington.

Noes: Councilmembers Armstrong, Olds, Woolley and President Dean.

/s/ Shirley Dean

Shirley Dean

Mayor and President of the Council

/s/ ATTEST: Sherry M. Kelly Sherry M. Kelly

Clerk of the Council

In effect: June 12,1997

ORDINANCE NO. 6371-N.S.

AMENDING CHAPTER 13.37 OF THE BERKELEY MUNICIPAL CODE ORDINANCE NO. 6266-N.S., AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 6282-N.S., REGULATING THE TIME, PLACE AND MANNER OF SOLICITATION FOR THE IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF MONEY OR GOODS IN PUBLIC PLACES, TO DELETE THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO SOLICITING FROM PERSONS ENTERING OR EXITING AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES WITHIN SIX FEET OF CERTAIN BUILDINGS IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS AND AFTER DARK

BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Berkeley as follows:

Section 1. That Ordinance No. 6266-N.S., as amended by Ordinance No. 6282-N.S. co[943]*943dified as Chapter 13.37 of Title 13 (Public Peace, Morals and Welfare) of the Berkeley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 13.37

LIMITATION OF THE TIME, PLACE AND MANNER OF SOLICITATION FOR THE IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF MONEY OR GOODS IN PUBLIC PLACES.

Sections:

13.37.010 Definitions

13.37.020 Prohibited Acts

13.37.030 Violation-Penalty

Section 13.37.010 Definitions

For purposes of this Ordinance the following terms shall be defined as set forth in this section.

A. “Coerces, threatens, hounds or intimidates the person solicited” means soliciting another in any of the following manners:

1. The solicitor acts in a manner which would cause a reasonable person who was solicited to fear for his or her own safety. Factors to be weighed in determining whether the behavior would cause a reasonable person to fear for his or her own safety include but are not limited to, the making of threatening gestures, the proximity of the solicitor to the person solicited, the duration of the solicitation, making physical contact with the person solicited.

2. The person who solicits persists in following the person solicited closely, after the person being solicited has informed the solicitor by words or conduct that such person does not want to be solicited.

B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
966 F. Supp. 941, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11975, 1997 WL 359258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkeley-community-health-project-v-city-of-berkeley-cand-1997.