Berkeley Associates Co. v. McQuillan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berkeley Associates Co. v. McQuillan

99 A.D.2d 708, 471 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17057

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.2d 708 (Berkeley Associates Co. v. McQuillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berkeley Associates Co. v. McQuillan, 99 A.D.2d 708, 471 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 for a writ in the nature of mandamus is dismissed, without costs, for mootness, pursuant to the order of remittitur of the Court of Appeals entered December 15,1983 (61 NY2d 639), reversing the judgment of this court entered February 10,1983 (92 AD2d 483), which had previously dismissed the petition. Notwithstanding the prior termination of this proceeding by this court, we now dismiss the proceeding for mootness pursuant to the mandate of the Court of Appeals. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Asch, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 for a writ in the nature of mandamus is dismissed, without costs, for mootness, pursuant to the order of remittitur of the Court of Appeals entered December 15,1983 (61 NY2d 639), reversing the judgment of this court entered February 10,1983 (92 AD2d 483), which had previously dismissed the petition. Notwithstanding the prior termination of this proceeding by this court, we now dismiss the proceeding for mootness pursuant to the mandate of the Court of Appeals. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Asch, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 708, 471 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berkeley-associates-co-v-mcquillan-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack