Berke v. State

704 So. 2d 567, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8655, 1997 WL 402514
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 1997·No. No. 96-3999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence entered after a revocation of the defendant’s probation. We find no error in the revocation proceedings but we must remand the case for the entry of a written probation revocation order conforming to the oral findings made by the trial court at the close of the hearing. Gregg v. State, 643 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Cue v. State, 619 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The defendant need not be present when this correction is made. Boynton v. State, 622 So.2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

ALLEN, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berke v. State, 704 So. 2d 567, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8655, 1997 WL 402514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

704 So. 2d 567 (Berke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Agar v. State
833 So. 2d 881 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Bell v. State
766 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)