Berk v. Tew

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Berk v. Tew

230 So. 2d 705, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7044

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1970·No. No. 69-973·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this interlocutory appeal seeks reversal of the chancellor’s order which increased his child support obligation to his divorced wife, the appellee. The appellant’s grounds are that the chancellor abused his discretion by denying his motion for continuance. We cannot agree; after a close review of the record, we must conclude that no abuse of discretion has been shown and the court’s refusal to continue the hearing was not improper. Maistrosky v. Harvey, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 103; State v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, Fla. 1961, 134 So.2d 12.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this interlocutory appeal seeks reversal of the chancellor’s order which increased his child support obligation to his divorced wife, the appellee. The appellant’s grounds are that the chancellor abused his discretion by denying his motion for continuance. We cannot agree; after a close review of the record, we must conclude that no abuse of discretion has been shown and the court’s refusal to continue the hearing was not improper. Maistrosky v. Harvey, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 103; State v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, Fla. 1961, 134 So.2d 12.

Affirmed.

Berk v. Tew, 230 So. 2d 705, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

230 So. 2d 705 (Berk v. Tew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related