Beristain (Derrik) Vs. State

479 P.3d 1005
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 10, 2021
Docket82401
StatusPublished

This text of 479 P.3d 1005 (Beristain (Derrik) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beristain (Derrik) Vs. State, 479 P.3d 1005 (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DERRIK BERISTAIN, No. 82401 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. FEB 1 0 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT ey ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTLEF A--;11' i

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order dismissing a motion to enforce guilty plea agreement. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order dismissing a motion to enforce guilty plea agreement, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

-94.1te6m5LISN°16". Parraguirre

Ale4C4.-0 , J. Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Derrik Beristain Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 P.3d 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beristain-derrik-vs-state-nev-2021.