Berisky v. Pacelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Berisky v. Pacelli

24 A.D.2d 870, 264 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 870 (Berisky v. Pacelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berisky v. Pacelli, 24 A.D.2d 870, 264 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a negligence action, resulting from the collision of two automobiles in Orange County, plaintiffs in Actions Nos. 2 and 3, who are respectively residents of New York and Richmond Counties, and plaintiff in Action No. 4, a resident of Richmond County, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered November 12, 1964, which (1) granted the motion of plaintiffs in Action No. 1, who are nonresidents, for a joint trial of all four actions in Orange County (where Action No. 1 was pending); and (2) in effect denied the cross motions of plaintiffs in Actions Nos. 2, 3 and 4, for the removal of all the actions to New York County (where Action No. 2 had been commenced). Order affirmed, without costs. (See Berisky v. Pacelli, 24 A D 2d 870.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action, resulting from the collision of two automobiles in Orange County, plaintiffs in Actions Nos. 2 and 3, who are respectively residents of New York and Richmond Counties, and plaintiff in Action No. 4, a resident of Richmond County, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered November 12, 1964, which (1) granted the motion of plaintiffs in Action No. 1, who are nonresidents, for a joint trial of all four actions in Orange County (where Action No. 1 was pending); and (2) in effect denied the cross motions of plaintiffs in Actions Nos. 2, 3 and 4, for the removal of all the actions to New York County (where Action No. 2 had been commenced). Order affirmed, without costs. (See Berisky v. Pacelli, 24 A D 2d 870.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 870, 264 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berisky-v-pacelli-nyappdiv-1965.