Berisha v. Liu

116 A.D.3d 891, 983 N.Y.S.2d 864

This text of 116 A.D.3d 891 (Berisha v. Liu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berisha v. Liu, 116 A.D.3d 891, 983 N.Y.S.2d 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the de[892]*892fendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J.), dated October 25, 2013, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The papers submitted by the defendants failed to adequately address the plaintiffs claim, set forth in the bill of particulars, that he sustained serious injuries to the cervical and thoracic regions of his spine (cf. Staff v Yshua, 59 AD3d 614 [2009]).

Since the defendants did not sustain their prima facie burden, it is unnecessary to determine whether the papers submitted by the plaintiff in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Che Hong Kim v Kossoff, 90 AD3d 969 [2011]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the subject accident. Dillon, J.P, Leventhal, Chambers and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.
774 N.E.2d 1197 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Gaddy v. Eyler
591 N.E.2d 1176 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Staff v. Mair Yshua
59 A.D.3d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Che Hong Kim v. Kossoff
90 A.D.3d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A.D.3d 891, 983 N.Y.S.2d 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berisha-v-liu-nyappdiv-2014.