Berhil v. Fisk

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Berhil v. Fisk

24 La. Ann. 149

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 15, 1872

DocketNo. 3565

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 La. Ann. 149 (Berhil v. Fisk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berhil v. Fisk, 24 La. Ann. 149 (La. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Ludeling, C. J.

The only question, necessary to bo decided in this case is, whether or not tho district attorney can be compelled by mandamus to bring an action under the intrusion act. .

This is not now an open question. We held in Hayes v. Thompson, 21 An. 656. that the district attorney could he compelled by mandamus to bring the suit, and the same doctrine has been several times: reaffirmed siuce. State ex rel. Rills v. B. L. Lynch, 23 Au. 786.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of tho lower court be affirmed with costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ludeling, C. J.

The only question, necessary to bo decided in this case is, whether or not tho district attorney can be compelled by mandamus to bring an action under the intrusion act. .

This is not now an open question. We held in Hayes v. Thompson, 21 An. 656. that the district attorney could he compelled by mandamus to bring the suit, and the same doctrine has been several times: reaffirmed siuce. State ex rel. Rills v. B. L. Lynch, 23 Au. 786.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of tho lower court be affirmed with costs of appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 La. Ann. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berhil-v-fisk-la-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack