Berhil v. Fisk
24 La. Ann. 149
Opinion
The only question, necessary to bo decided in this case is, whether or not tho district attorney can be compelled by mandamus to bring an action under the intrusion act. .
This is not now an open question. We held in Hayes v. Thompson, 21 An. 656. that the district attorney could he compelled by mandamus to bring the suit, and the same doctrine has been several times: reaffirmed siuce. State ex rel. Rills v. B. L. Lynch, 23 Au. 786.
It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of tho lower court be affirmed with costs of appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berhil v. Fisk, 24 La. Ann. 149 (La. 1872).
24 La. Ann. 149 (Berhil v. Fisk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. Fuller
118 So. 42 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
State ex rel. Heitkamp v. Lancaster
42 So. 583 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)