Bergstol v. Town of Monroe

296 A.D.2d 431, 744 N.Y.S.2d 712, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7389
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that Local Law No. 2 (2001) of the Town of Monroe is illegal, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated September 20, 2001. Motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it has been rendered academic. By decision and order of this Court, dated April 30, 2002, the motion was held in abeyance and was referred to the justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bergstol v. Town of Monroe, 296 A.D.2d 431, 744 N.Y.S.2d 712, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7389 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

296 A.D.2d 431 (Bergstol v. Town of Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Seneca Meadows, Inc. v. Town of Seneca Falls
2021 NY Slip Op 04836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Westbury Trombo, Inc. v. Board of Trustees
307 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)