Bergstein v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bergstein v. Board of Education

42 A.D.2d 591, 344 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4154

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 591 (Bergstein v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bergstein v. Board of Education, 42 A.D.2d 591, 344 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondent’s determination dated August 16, 1971, which denied petitioner Leonard Bergstein tenure and terminated his employment with respondent as a teacher, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 7, 1972, which dismissed the petition after a hearing. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and proceeding remanded to Special Term for a new hearing and determination. Petitioner Leonard Bergstein, a social studies teacher, alleged inter alla that he had been denied tenure and that his employment was terminated because of his exercise of his First Amendment rights. We are of the opinion that Special Term, in holding that the members of the Board of Education who voted against tenure for petitioner were not motivated by a desire to retaliate against him on account of his political or religious beliefs or his extracurricular activities, relied upon hearsay statements by some of the board members as to the reason they voted against tenure. Accordingly, a new hearing should be held by Special Term, at which the respondent board shall have an opportunity to produce legal and competent evidence to establish that tenure was not denied for impermissible reasons (see Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U. S. 564; Matter of Tisehler v. Board of Edue. of Monroe Woodbury Gent. School JDist. No. 1, 37 A D 2d 261). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review respondent’s determination dated August 16, 1971, which denied petitioner Leonard Bergstein tenure and terminated his employment with respondent as a teacher, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 7, 1972, which dismissed the petition after a hearing. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, and proceeding remanded to Special Term for a new hearing and determination. Petitioner Leonard Bergstein, a social studies teacher, alleged inter alla that he had been denied tenure and that his employment was terminated because of his exercise of his First Amendment rights. We are of the opinion that Special Term, in holding that the members of the Board of Education who voted against tenure for petitioner were not motivated by a desire to retaliate against him on account of his political or religious beliefs or his extracurricular activities, relied upon hearsay statements by some of the board members as to the reason they voted against tenure. Accordingly, a new hearing should be held by Special Term, at which the respondent board shall have an opportunity to produce legal and competent evidence to establish that tenure was not denied for impermissible reasons (see Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U. S. 564; Matter of Tisehler v. Board of Edue. of Monroe Woodbury Gent. School JDist. No. 1, 37 A D 2d 261). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 591, 344 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergstein-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack