Bergsmann v. Engel

235 A.D. 694

This text of 235 A.D. 694 (Bergsmann v. Engel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bergsmann v. Engel, 235 A.D. 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion of defendant Deats to set aside the order of publication [695]*695and to vacate service of the summons and complaint on him granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that said defendant was a non-resident, and substituted service of process on him was improper and invalid in this action. (Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714, 727.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pennoyer v. Neff
95 U.S. 714 (Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bergsmann-v-engel-nyappdiv-1932.